Criminal markets
5.13-0.07
An assessment of the value, prevalence and non-monetary impacts of a specific crime type.
Human trafficking
5.000.00
Illicit activity involving coercion, deception, abduction or fraud for the purpose of exploitation, regardless of the victim’s consent.
Human smuggling
5.500.00
Activities by an organized crime group involving the illegal entry, transit or residence of migrants for a financial or material benefit.
Extortion and protection racketeering
5.000.00
Crimes linked to exerting control over a territory/market including as a mediator and/or requesting a benefit in exchange for protection.
Arms trafficking
6.000.00
The sale, acquisition, movement, and diversion of arms, their parts and ammunition from legal to illegal commerce and/or across borders.
Trade in counterfeit goods
3.000.00
The production, transport, storage and sale of goods that are fraudulently mislabeled or fraudulent imitations of registered brands.
Illicit trade in excisable goods
7.500.00
The illicit transport, handling and sale of excise consumer goods despite a ban or outside a legal market. Excludes oil and counterfeits.
Flora crimes
3.000.00
The illicit trade and possession of species covered by CITES convention, and other species protected under national law.
Fauna crimes
5.00-0.50
The poaching, illicit trade in and possession of species covered by CITES and other species protected by national law. Includes IUU fishing.
Non-renewable resource crimes
3.500.00
The illicit extraction, smuggling, mingling, bunkering or mining of natural resources and the illicit trade of such commodities.
Heroin trade
5.00-0.50
The production, distribution and sale of heroin. Consumption of the drug is considered in determining the reach of the criminal market.
Cocaine trade
7.000.00
The production, distribution and sale of cocaine and its derivatives. Consumption is considered in determining the reach of the market.
Cannabis trade
6.000.00
The illicit cultivation, distribution and sale of cannabis oil, resin, herb or leaves. Consumption is used to determine the market's reach.
Synthetic drug trade
4.500.50
The production, distribution and sale of synthetic drugs. Consumption is considered in determining the reach of the market.
Cyber-dependent crimes
5.00-0.50
Organized crimes that rely solely on using information communications technology with the aim of obtaining a monetary/material benefit.
Financial crimes
6.000.00
Organized crime that results in a monetary loss via financial fraud, embezzlement, misuse of funds, tax evasion and abusive tax avoidance.
Criminal actors
6.50-0.10
An assessment of the impact and influence of a specific criminal actor type on society.
Criminal networks
7.000.00
Loose networks of criminal associates engaging in criminal activities who fail to meet the defining characteristics of mafia-style groups.
State-embedded actors
7.000.00
Criminal actors that are embedded in, and act from within, the state’s apparatus.
Foreign actors
6.000.00
State and/or non-state criminal actors operating outside their home country. Includes foreign nationals and diaspora groups.
Private sector actors
5.00-0.50
Profit-seeking individuals/entities who own/control a part of the legal economy free from the state, that collaborate with criminal actors.
Government transparency and accountability
4.500.00
The degree to which states have put oversight mechanisms in place to ensure against state collusion in illicit activities.
International cooperation
6.500.50
A country's supranational structures and processes of interaction, policy making and concrete implementation to respond to organized crime.
National policies and laws
5.000.00
A state's legal action and structures put in place to respond to organized crime.
Judicial system and detention
4.500.00
Refers to a state’s judiciary’s power to effectively and independently enforce judgments on organized crime-related cases.
Law enforcement
4.500.00
The state’s ability to investigate, gather intelligence, protect and enforce adherence to its rules and procedures against organized crime.
Territorial integrity
5.000.00
The degree to which states are able to control their physical and cyber territory and infrastructure against organized criminal activities.
Anti-money laundering
5.000.00
A state’s ability to implement measures to combat money laundering and other related threats to the integrity of its financial system.
Economic regulatory capacity
4.000.00
The ability to control/manage the economy and regulate transactions (national and international) for trade to thrive within the rule of law.
Victim and witness support
4.000.00
Assistance provided to victims of various forms of organized crime, including initiatives such as witness protection programs.
Prevention
5.000.00
Refers to the existence of strategies, measures, resource allocation, programmes and processes that are aimed to inhibit organized crime.
Non-state actors
5.000.00
The degree non-state actors are allowed to engage in OC responses and their roles in supporting State efforts/ as watchdogs to governments.
Government transparency and accountability
4.500.00
The degree to which states have put oversight mechanisms in place to ensure against state collusion in illicit activities.
International cooperation
6.500.50
A country's supranational structures and processes of interaction, policy making and concrete implementation to respond to organized crime.
National policies and laws
5.000.00
A state's legal action and structures put in place to respond to organized crime.
Judicial system and detention
4.500.00
Refers to a state’s judiciary’s power to effectively and independently enforce judgments on organized crime-related cases.
Law enforcement
4.500.00
The state’s ability to investigate, gather intelligence, protect and enforce adherence to its rules and procedures against organized crime.
Territorial integrity
5.000.00
The degree to which states are able to control their physical and cyber territory and infrastructure against organized criminal activities.
Anti-money laundering
5.000.00
A state’s ability to implement measures to combat money laundering and other related threats to the integrity of its financial system.
Economic regulatory capacity
4.000.00
The ability to control/manage the economy and regulate transactions (national and international) for trade to thrive within the rule of law.
Victim and witness support
4.000.00
Assistance provided to victims of various forms of organized crime, including initiatives such as witness protection programs.
Prevention
5.000.00
Refers to the existence of strategies, measures, resource allocation, programmes and processes that are aimed to inhibit organized crime.
Non-state actors
5.000.00
The degree non-state actors are allowed to engage in OC responses and their roles in supporting State efforts/ as watchdogs to governments.
Montenegro serves as both a source and destination country for human trafficking, with victims primarily exploited for sex trafficking and forced labour. The transnational nature of this market encompasses local criminal groups alongside foreign actors. Victims of sex trafficking in Montenegro are primarily women and girls from Montenegro, neighbouring Balkan nations and Eastern Europe. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in Russian nationals becoming victims of trafficking, reflecting shifting demographic trends. Roma children are often subjected to forced begging and illicit marriages, with law enforcement frequently dismissing these cases as cultural practices. Despite legislative efforts, Montenegro has not met minimum standards for victim protection, and there has been no significant increase in prosecutions or convictions. Additionally, government officials have also been implicated in cases involving forced labour, particularly concerning Turkish nationals working on construction sites.
The human smuggling market in Montenegro remains a concern, particularly due to the country's geographic location along key migration routes. However, no major incident has been reported since the previous reporting period. Migrants from Asia are primarily smuggled into Montenegro through land or air routes, often attempting to cross into Croatia or Bosnia and Herzegovina. While Montenegrin authorities have made efforts to disrupt smuggling networks through regular police operations, the country continues to struggle with weak prosecution capabilities and inadequate data collection. Smuggling networks primarily consist of Montenegrin nationals and foreign actors, notably individuals from Türkiye and Albania, who facilitate illegal border crossings. Extortion and protection racketeering remain embedded in Montenegro’s criminal landscape, involving both domestic and foreign actors, including criminal networks with political connections. These activities primarily target the hospitality and construction sectors, with businesses in tourist hubs such as Budva, Herceg Novi, Tivat and Bar frequently subjected to coercion. Extortion schemes typically involve threats, blackmail and physical violence, often employing third-party enforcers to intimidate victims.
Montenegro is a transit hub for arms trafficking, with weapons flowing through the country from Bosnia and Herzegovina to Kosovo and subsequently to Western Europe. The market is dominated by notorious organized crime groups, such as the Kavač and Škaljari clans, as well as state-embedded actors. These groups procure illegal firearms for various criminal activities, including drug trafficking, extortion and conflicts between gangs. Smuggling methods range from concealing firearms among legal goods to modifying readily available items into weapons suitable for criminal use. Despite some government initiatives, including international collaboration to destroy seized weapons, arms-related crimes remain prevalent, with Montenegro recording one of the highest rates of firearm incidents in the region.
The trade in counterfeit goods is driven by demand from both local consumers and tourists, with most counterfeit items originating from Türkiye and China. While law enforcement has intensified market inspections and customs controls, the online sale of counterfeit goods presents new challenges. Montenegro primarily serves as a destination market for counterfeit branded merchandise, including clothing, accessories and pirated optical media.
Montenegro remains a significant player in the illicit trade of excise goods, particularly tobacco. Smuggling operations have historically benefited from corruption within law enforcement, resulting in high-profile arrests, including that of a former head of the Revenue and Customs Administration. The Port of Bar serves as a key hub for cigarette smuggling into Europe. While government efforts have led to a decline in the illicit cigarette market share, transnational smuggling networks continue to exploit Montenegro’s strategic location, making it one of the primary origin points for seized cigarettes worldwide, alongside the UAE and Türkiye.
Illegal logging in Montenegro is a well-organized criminal market, facilitated by corruption within the relevant authorities and lenient enforcement policies. The market is dominantly domestic, with illegally harvested wood used for heating, while small quantities are exported to the EU. Abuses of the concession system enable private companies to exceed quotas or engage in fraudulent documentation, thereby misrepresenting illegal logging as a legitimate activity. The state’s limited enforcement capacity has led to a lack of prosecutions and inadequate penalties.
Wildlife crimes, including poaching and the illegal trade in protected species, continue to be prevalent. Reports of illegal killings of griffon vultures, bears and pelicans highlight ongoing challenges in conservation efforts. Montenegro also serves as a transit hub for wildlife smuggling, with exotic species such as birds, big cats, monkeys and tropical reptiles being trafficked to the EU. The criminal market operates on both domestic and transnational levels, with many animals exported to the EU through Croatia, particularly through the Debeli Brijeg border crossing. The absence of proper enforcement mechanisms and weak inter-agency coordination exacerbate these issues.
Non-renewable resource crimes, particularly the illicit extraction of gravel and sand, continue to pose significant environmental and economic risks. Despite efforts to regulate excavation, illegal operations persist, often involving private-sector actors and foreign entities. Recent allegations also suggest the complicity of state-embedded actors, specifically in the illicit extraction of gravel. Although less widespread, fuel smuggling has been linked to transnational networks operating between Montenegro, Albania and Libya.
The heroin trade in Montenegro is predominantly transnational, with the country serving as a transit point for heroin trafficked from Iran, Pakistan and Türkiye. Local demand for heroin is relatively low, and seizures tend to be small, though occasional large-scale busts highlight the continued presence of established smuggling routes. Law enforcement bodies have reported an increased presence of unregistered psychoactive substances, including fentanyl, which raises concerns about potential shifts in the drug market.
Montenegro is deeply entangled in the global cocaine trade, with local criminal groups such as the Kavač and Škaljari clans playing a significant role in smuggling cocaine from South America to Europe. The Port of Bar has been implicated in several large-scale cocaine shipments. Despite occasional high-profile arrests, the market remains highly lucrative, with drug profits laundered through real estate and hospitality investments along the Adriatic coast. Internal conflicts within Montenegrin crime groups have led to violent clashes both domestically and internationally, demonstrating the high stakes of the cocaine trade.
Cannabis trafficking continues to be a well-established market, with Montenegro primarily serving as a transit country for Albanian-produced cannabis headed for the EU. Local cultivation has been observed in border regions, and law enforcement institutions have documented significant seizures. Reports indicate that there is a potential increase in cannabis smuggling through the Port of Bar, raising concerns over evolving trafficking routes.
The synthetic drug trade in Montenegro is relatively small but is experiencing growth, evidenced by a notable increase in the seizure of synthetic drugs. The market is closely linked to cocaine and heroin trafficking, with synthetic drugs primarily entering Montenegro from Western Europe through Serbia. Consumption spikes during the summer months, particularly in tourist areas. A limited government response and weak monitoring mechanisms hinder efforts to address emerging threats, such as the distribution of fentanyl.
Montenegro has experienced a rise in cyber-dependent crimes, with foreign actors targeting government systems and financial institutions. Ransomware and Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks as well as cryptocurrency-related fraud are prevalent forms of cyber-dependent crimes seen in the country. A series of cyberattacks in recent years has disrupted state services, leaving authorities struggling to restore full system functionality. These historic attacks led to governmental efforts to strengthen its cyber capabilities; however, Montenegro’s cybersecurity infrastructure remains inadequate. The shortage of skilled personnel and limited investment in cybersecurity measures have rendered government institutions particularly vulnerable.
Financial crime in Montenegro is deeply entrenched, characterized by the mismanagement of public funds, irregularities in political financing and large-scale corruption. The procurement sector remains particularly vulnerable. The misuse of EU funds and fraudulent privatization schemes further highlight the systemic vulnerabilities within the financial sector. The ongoing prevalence of financial crime in Montenegro underscores the broader challenge of institutional corruption, which continues to impede the country’s efforts to combat organized crime effectively.
Montenegro is home to two dominant mafia-style groups: the Kavač and Škaljari clans, which maintain significant influence within the country’s criminal landscape. While they do not control territories outright, their operations extend across Montenegro and into other countries, where members frequently seek refuge from law enforcement. Despite intensified efforts by law enforcement bodies, including the arrest of key figures, these groups continue to exert control over criminal markets by actively recruiting new members, even within the prison system. The primary sources of income for these clans are cocaine trafficking and money laundering, with Europol estimating that they control at least 30% of the cocaine trade from Latin America to Europe. Their extensive financial holdings, including substantial real estate investments in Bosnia and Herzegovina, further illustrate their economic power. Additionally, they engage in extortion and racketeering, employing violence and intimidation to secure their criminal enterprises. These activities have fuelled ongoing conflicts between the two clans, leading to a surge in homicides.
Criminal networks in Montenegro, concentrated in coastal and border areas near Albania and Serbia, operate with moderate levels of violence. Groups based in Budva, Bar, Berane and Mojkovac play key roles in international drug trafficking and are connected to the broader Balkan cartel, a transnational alliance of criminal groups from across the region. Unlike mafia-style organizations, these networks rely less on direct control and more on political connections that grant them relative impunity. Leaked encrypted communications have revealed how criminal proceeds are used to secure political protection and influence the judiciary and law enforcement. Recent reports identified several high-risk groups, each with dozens of members, primarily engaged in cocaine trafficking and collaborating with other Western Balkan networks to distribute drugs across Europe.
State-embedded actors in Montenegro maintain deep-rooted connections to organized crime, facilitating illicit activities through corruption and regulatory weaknesses. High-ranking officials have been implicated in significant transnational crimes, including drug trafficking, illicit tobacco trade and illegal logging. Despite ongoing investigations and arrests, the persistent involvement of state officials in these markets undermines law enforcement efforts. Notable cases include the prosecution of high-ranking law enforcement and judicial officials for alleged connections to notorious organized crime groups, underscoring ongoing concerns about corruption and the influence of criminal networks within state institutions. The systemic nature of corruption extends beyond law enforcement, with former high-ranking officials implicated in financial crimes. In 2024, transcripts from encrypted communications revealed the involvement of criminal groups in Montenegro’s electoral processes, exposing illegal funding of political campaigns and political protection in exchange for financial incentives.
Foreign criminal actors play a significant role in Montenegro’s organized crime landscape, with increasing cooperation between local and international groups. Major clans maintain strong ties with criminal organizations in the EU, Latin America and the broader Western Balkans, particularly through drug trafficking networks. Port cities such as Bar and Kotor serve as key entry points for illicit drug shipments, attracting foreign actors involved in cocaine trafficking. In addition to drug smuggling, foreign actors have been active in human trafficking, particularly Turkish criminal groups that facilitate the transit of migrants through Montenegro to Western Europe. These networks exploit legal loopholes, using transit visas and temporary residence permits to create pathways for irregular migration. Recent reports have highlighted the growing presence of foreign criminal organizations from Türkiye, Georgia, Russia and Eastern Europe, underscoring Montenegro’s increasing involvement in transnational organized crime networks.
The private sector in Montenegro is a key enabler of organized crime, particularly through real estate investments and financial crimes. According to recent reports, real estate has become the primary vehicle for money laundering, with illicit proceeds from drug trafficking and corruption funnelled into high-value properties. Business owners often engage in bribery to secure favourable regulatory conditions, while foreign investors seek to establish political connections to facilitate their business operations. While there is no evidence that criminal organizations entirely control any specific private-sector industry, corruption within the private sector allows these criminal groups to operate with minimal oversight. Cases of financial mismanagement, such as fraudulent privatization schemes and the misuse of EU funds, further highlight the systemic vulnerabilities that enable illicit financial flows. Despite efforts to improve regulatory oversight, Montenegro’s private sector remains susceptible to exploitation by organized crime networks.
Montenegro has experienced political instability over the past two years, with the formation of a new government in October 2023 after prolonged negotiations. The coalition government has pledged to prioritize EU integration, NATO membership and regional cooperation. However, despite commitments to combat organized crime and corruption, political divisions continue to hinder effective governance and legislative reforms. While there have been notable arrests of high-profile figures linked to organized crime, concerns remain regarding the sustainability of these efforts, given Montenegro’s history of corruption and political interference. In 2024, Montenegro’s EU accession process advanced with the adoption of an Interim Benchmark Assessment Report, which confirmed the country’s compliance with judicial and anti-corruption benchmarks. This development resulted in the unfreezing of Montenegro’s EU accession negotiations. Nevertheless, domestic critics have raised concerns regarding the quality of the implemented reforms, arguing that legislative amendments lacked sufficient consultation and may not lead to long-term systemic improvements.
Montenegro’s transparency and accountability mechanisms have demonstrated mixed progress. Initiatives such as the establishment of a National Council for the Fight Against Corruption and a registry for ultimate beneficial ownership reflect efforts to enhance transparency. Yet, the effectiveness of these initiatives remains in question due to ongoing governance gaps. Furthermore, the Parliament has yet to adopt amendments to the Law on access to information that could significantly increase space and opportunity for civil control over Government operations. The Anti-Corruption Agency, despite showing some improvements, continues to face political influence and operational limitations.
Montenegro has strengthened its international cooperation by engaging with Europol, INTERPOL and regional law enforcement agencies. The country has participated in various EU-funded initiatives aimed at combating organized crime, arms trafficking and human trafficking. Montenegro has demonstrated compliance with extradition agreements, successfully extraditing several high-profile criminal suspects in 2023 and 2024. Additionally, through collaboration with UNODC, the country receives support for legislative reforms, financial investigations, international cooperation and strengthening anti-corruption institutions. However, issues related to state capture and political instability continue to pose challenges to effective cross-border cooperation.
Montenegro has established a legal framework to combat various forms of organized crime. Recent legislative reforms have aligned national laws with EU directives, thereby improving compliance with international standards. However, enforcement remains inconsistent, and gaps persist in implementation, particularly regarding asset recovery and financial transparency regulations. Amendments to anti-corruption and criminal procedure laws have aimed to enhance prosecutorial efficiency; however, their practical impact has been undermined by limited institutional capacity and ongoing political interference.
Montenegro’s judicial system continues to face significant challenges, including limited resources, corruption, inefficiency, political interference and persistent case backlogs. While previous constitutional reforms enhanced judicial independence, their enforcement remains weak. The judiciary has made some progress in prosecuting organized crime and corruption, as reflected in a rise in convictions in recent years. However, reforms have not addressed gaps in the disciplinary and ethical framework for judges and prosecutors. Although the Prosecutor’s Council created a commission to handle complaints about threats to independence, the ethical commission acts only reactively on complaints and does not proactively monitor compliance with ethical standards. Lenient sentencing and prolonged trials further undermine the effectiveness of legal proceedings. The system also struggles with inconsistent enforcement of asset declarations among judges and prosecutors. Detention conditions remain substandard, with reports of regular abuse by corrections officers and a high percentage of the prison population held in pre-trial detention.
Law enforcement in Montenegro has undergone structural changes, leading to enhanced cooperation between police and prosecution offices. The Special Prosecution Office has achieved notable successes in targeting organized crime, securing budget increases and additional personnel. However, several weaknesses persist, including underfunding, staffing shortages, insufficient specialized training and political interference in police leadership. The dismissal of police officials in recent years has sparked controversy, raising concerns about procedural irregularities and the political motivations behind these decisions. Additionally, Montenegro has also faced criticism for its limited implementation of intelligence-led policing, as most investigations remain reactive rather than proactive.
Border security continues to pose a challenge, with Montenegro serving as a key transit point for various illicit activities. The country has taken steps to enhance border management through joint patrols and enhanced collaboration with Frontex. However, critical gaps in staffing, surveillance infrastructure and monitoring capabilities remain. Despite some improvements, smuggling activities, particularly in the illicit tobacco trade and drug trafficking, continue to exploit weaknesses in border controls.
Montenegro’s anti-money laundering (AML) framework has improved in recent years, yet enforcement remains inconsistent. The country’s financial intelligence unit has undergone multiple restructurings, which have impacted its stability and operational effectiveness. Despite legislative reforms that align with international AML standards, challenges persist in asset seizures, financial investigations and prosecution rates for money laundering cases. Recently, organized crime groups have increasingly exploited regulatory gaps in digital assets, complicating asset traceability. High-profile acquittals in money laundering cases have raised concerns about judicial independence and the quality of investigations.
Montenegro’s economic regulatory environment exhibits structural weaknesses, particularly in transparency and oversight mechanisms. While macroeconomic indicators have shown signs of improvement, the country remains vulnerable to illicit financial flows due to regulatory gaps in real estate investment and cryptocurrency transactions. The government has taken steps to modernize tax regulations and enhance corporate governance; however, political instability has delayed key economic reforms.
Victim and witness support services in Montenegro are still underdeveloped. Despite increased efforts to identify victims, the role of law enforcement in screening and assisting them remains limited, with NGOs and international organizations often filling the gap. The country lacks a comprehensive witness protection programme, and the quality of legal aid for trafficking victims varies. While Montenegro has made progress in aligning its legal framework with international standards, the implementation of victim compensation laws is still pending. Additionally, allegations of mismanagement in NGO-run shelters have further highlighted deficiencies in the victim support infrastructure.
Preventive measures against organized crime and corruption in Montenegro lack cohesion. The country has not adopted a comprehensive anti-corruption strategy in recent years, and legislative amendments addressing corruption, organized crime and human trafficking remain fragmented. The Anti-Corruption Agency is involved in whistle-blower protection and public interest cases, but its effectiveness is limited by political influence and inconsistencies in enforcement.
Montenegro’s civil society sector plays a vital role in investigating corruption and organized crime, with NGOs and investigative journalists frequently uncovering high-profile cases. However, the operating environment for civil society remains challenging due to government scrutiny, inadequate legal protections, and economic pressures that limit media independence. While Montenegro has shown improvements in press freedom rankings, concerns remain over political interference, journalist safety and disinformation campaigns.
For a better experience, please rotate your device.
The criminal markets score is represented by the pyramid base size and the criminal actors score is represented by the pyramid height, on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. The resilience score is represented by the panel height, which can be identified by the side of the panel.
The Index Podcast
A deep dive into the Global Organized Crime Index
We're constantly working to improve the Index. By participating in this survey, you will be providing us with insights and suggestions that will help us make the Index an even better resource.